In addition, and most importantly, the Vice-Chair stated that it would generally not be appropriate to denounce an expired agreement when negotiations for a new agreement are ongoing and there is a reasonable chance of success, even if the process has become “long”. The Vice-Chair considered that it was not appropriate to denounce the two agreements, as it would reduce the likelihood that the parties would reach an agreement during their ongoing negotiation process. That would be contrary to the provisions of the FW Act. Aurizon demanded, during the negotiations, that the unions approve the removal of the burdens inherited from the past in the company agreements that have expired. The unions refused to accept the removal of these provisions, saying they wanted a “transfer” of existing business terms to new company agreements. In Tahmoor Coal Pty Ltd [2010] FWA 6468, Vice-President Lawler (“Vice-President”) considered the FWA`s discretion to terminate agreements under section 226 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (“FW Act”). When signing the contract, the customer must define and communicate the number of desktop computers or qualified users and the desired Microsoft Enterprise or Enterprise Online Services products. This information is the first purchase. Each anniversary is due to a Collection Order (True Up Order) for additional desktop computers or qualified users, on the basis of which the total cost of the previous year is calculated.

Under a traditional on-premise-Microsoft enterprise agreement, the customer is allowed to license enterprise products individually or as a standard platform. However, at least one enterprise product must be standardized company-wide. In a pioneering judgment that reoriented the dynamics of negotiations under the Fair Work Act 2009 (“FW Act”), a full bench of the Fair Work Commission (“FWC”) terminated 12 company agreements that expired during an impasse in negotiations over its replacement: Aurizon Operations Ltd [2015] FWCFB 540. In doing so, the Full Bench (Watson VP, Gostencnik DP and Spencer C) rejected the idea that it was inappropriate to terminate a company agreement during negotiations. The decision marks a significant change in the FWC`s approach to terminating expired company agreements and opens the door for employers, limited by unfavourable agreements that have exceeded their nominal expiry date. With the spectre of working conditions returning to the underlying modern price, unions and workers will be under increased pressure to accept the terms offered by employers to replacement company agreements. What happened in Aurizon? Aurizon, formerly QR National before being privatised by the Queensland government, is Australia`s largest rail freight operator and employs over 6,000 people across Australia. In 2010, the Queensland government oversaw the inclusion of enforceable safeguards in QR National`s corporate agreements to allay fears about the impact of privatisation on workers. The guarantees offered workers generous conditions for a period of three years, including a ban on forced dismissals. Many other exceptionally restrictive conditions that restrict Aurizon`s ability to improve efficiency and have reduced it to a competitive disadvantage.. .

. .